  
  
 | 
 
  | 
  
 Volume 
	7: No. 3, May 2010 
ORIGINAL RESEARCH 
Racial/Ethnic Differences in Perceived Access, Environmental Barriers to Use, and Use of Community Parks
| Activity | 
Frequency of participation, % (95% 
Confidence Interval) | 
 
| White, non-Hispanic | 
Black, non-Hispanic | 
Hispanic | 
Othera | 
 
| Walking/hiking | 
58 (55-60)b | 
45 (39-52) | 
53 (48-59) | 
53 (44-61) | 
 
| Running/jogging | 
6 (5-7) | 
9 (6-13) | 
11 (8-15)c | 
12 (7-18)c | 
 
| Swimming | 
9 (8-11) | 
8 (5-12) | 
12 (9-17)d | 
13 (9-20)d | 
 
| Biking | 
9 (8-11) | 
10 (6-17) | 
12 (8-17) | 
15 (9-25) | 
 
| Playing sports | 
14 (12-15) | 
14 (9-20) | 
21 (16-26) | 
23 (16-31) | 
 
| Relaxing | 
51 (49-53) | 
55 (49-62) | 
53 (47-59) | 
51 (43-59) | 
 
| Picnicking | 
33 (31-36) | 
33 (27-40) | 
36 (30-41) | 
33 (26-41) | 
 
| Attending an outdoor event | 
31 (29-34) | 
33 (27-39) | 
30 (25-36) | 
33 (26-41) | 
 
| Attending a gathering of family or friends | 
40 (37-42) | 
49 (42-56)e | 
45 (39-51) | 
45 (37-53) | 
 
 
Figure. Participation in various activities during the previous 12 months among adult park visitors by race/ethnicity, HealthStyles 2006 (n = 3,763). Respondents were asked to indicate which of the following 9 activities that they had participated in: walking/hiking, picnicking, relaxing, swimming, biking, running/jogging, attending an outdoor event, playing sports, and attending a gathering of family or friends. Respondents could select multiple activities; 175 respondents did not select
any. 
a “Other” race/ethnicity includes American Indian, Alaska Native, Asian, Native Hawaiian, and other Pacific Islander. 
b In a pairwise comparison (t test), prevalence was significantly higher than in non-Hispanic blacks (non-Hispanic whites, P = .001, df = 2,979). 
c In a pairwise comparison (t test), prevalence was significantly higher than in non-Hispanic whites (Hispanics, P = .003, df = 3,069; “other” race/ethnicity, P = .04, df = 2,804). 
d In a pairwise comparison (t test), prevalence was significantly higher than in non-Hispanic whites (Hispanics, P = .01, df = 3,069; “other” race/ethnicity, P = .02, df = 2,804). 
e In a pairwise comparison (t test), prevalence was significantly higher than in non-Hispanic whites (non-Hispanic blacks, P = .01, df = 2,979). 
Return to article 
 | 
 
  |