|  
  Volume 
	7: No. 4, July 2010 
ESSAYMobilizing Action Toward Community Health (MATCH): Metrics, Incentives, and Partnerships for Population Health
00:00:00  Fran Kritz: I’m Fran Kritz, editor of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation 
public health page. Mobilizing Action Toward Community Health, better known as 
MATCH, is a groundbreaking initiative led by the University of Wisconsin 
Population Health Institute and funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
 00:00:16 Kritz: The goal of the project is to serve as a nationwide call to action 
for improving health. MATCH rolled out its efforts last February with the county 
health rankings.  00:00:26 Kritz: We’re talking today with Dr David Kindig, who is professor emeritus 
at the Population Health Institute at the University of Wisconsin and also the 
co-principal investigator for the MATCH project.  00:00:37  Kritz: Dr Kindig, welcome.  Dr David Kindig: Thank you for talking to me.  00:00:41 Kritz: We are talking today because there’s a new project and that is the new 
issue of the CDC’s online journal Preventing Chronic Disease, includes several 
essays that were commissioned by the MATCH project and the Robert Wood Johnson 
Foundation.  00:00:55  Kritz: Can you highlight some of the key research among the essays in the 
journal? Kindig: Sure. We were really privileged to have a number of the nation’s 
experts on metrics contribute essays to the project and coming out next week in 
the journal.  00:01:13 Kindig: As you mention before, a large part of our MATCH project beyond the 
county health rankings themselves is essentially to think through and provide 
advice about taking action and really improving population health. 00:01:26 Kindig: And there’s an old saying that you can’t manage what you can’t 
measure and so this first issue focuses on the measurement piece: ways of 
thinking about outcomes, about disparities, about the different determinants, 
and so there’s papers on medical care metrics and socioeconomic metrics and 
environmental metrics.  00:01:51 Kindig: So each of the essay writers has up-to-date, current thinking on 
current and possibly future metrics.  00:01:59 In addition, there’s a couple of inter, there’s a couple of commentaries that 
start it out and particularly Linda Bilhiemer from the CDC has a nice piece about 
how do we evaluate the metrics in terms of their usefulness for improving 
population health.  00:02:15 Kritz: How might some of the metrics be used in future national county health 
rankings projects and by individual communities? 00:2:23 Kindig: Sure, well, um, as you know the county health rankings will be done 
annually and we are hoping to keep the outcomes measures the same, so we can 
track the overall health of counties over time in a valid way.  00:02:39 Kindig: But as, hopefully as some of your listeners know, we also rank 
counties on their determinants of health. So metrics about medical care, social 
factors, environmental factors, and those we will change over time as new 
measures become available, particularly at the county level. Often we have 
trouble getting robust best measures for all kinds of small counties. So we will 
do that.  00:03:03 Kindig: But also, this goes beyond the rankings. I mean, individual states 
and communities may want to look at things their own way. Some areas may have 
better data so they can do more than we can do for every county. I’m hopeful 
that Healthy People 2020 and a lot of the state 2020 projects will look to 
these as possibilities for useful, for ways they can enhance their own metrics.
 00:03:31 Kritz: And health disparity is a key focus, I know. Using metrics to capture 
health disparity is a focus in some of the essays. Why is that data so pivotal? 00:03:40 Kindig: Well, you know, we talk about two goals of the nation: improving our 
overall health and reducing disparities. And I think frankly we spend a lot more 
time talking about the overall health, in metrics at least, and less time on 
actually careful metrics for health disparities, particularly for overall, um, 
overall, um, disparity outcomes like mortality, quality of life, and healthy 
days.  00:04:08 Kindig: And even in the county rankings they’re a disparity measure in 
themselves because they compare geographies. But we don’t in that exercise 
explicitly look within counties with disparities issues like race, socioeconomic 
status or gender.  00:04:26 Kindig: And so there’s a couple of, many of the essay writers talk about that 
and there’s some overall essays about the critical importance of tracking 
disparities with exactly the same rigor and vigor that we track, say, overall 
population health means.  00:04:43 Kritz: Having the data of course requires gathering much of it from 
individuals, and up until recently the way that that data was typically gathered 
was through surveys done by landline telephones. Now of course people use landline telephones and cell phones, social media, e-mail for communicating. How does 
that change how the data is gathered? 00:05:04 Kindig: Ya, well that’s a really important question. A number of the essays 
touch on it. The one on behavior by Mokdad and Remington specifically talks 
about that because a lot of the data we have on behaviors like smoking rates, 
and um, obesity rates and some of those things actually come from phone surveys, 
a lot of them the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System from the CDC.  00:05:28 Kindig: And some of that data is becoming problematic because of cell phones 
and other kinds of things. So they point out, and in addition to enhancing those 
systems and making them as good as they can be, we’re going to have to look at 
data from other institutional settings, like what you can get from medical 
records, and health care providers, or in schools, or from employers. All those 
databases, as well as sort of Internet-based surveys.  00:05:58  Kindig: So there will be, there undoubtedly will be advances in the future on 
how we learn about these things and measure them.  00:06:08 Kritz: Doctor David Kindig, thank you so much for discussing the upcoming 
issue of Preventing Chronic Disease. Kindig: Thanks so much, it was a pleasure talking to you. Kritz: I’m Fran Kritz for the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Return to article |