|  
  
 |  
 |  
  Volume 
          3: 
          No. 3, July 2006 
LETTER TO THE EDITORPhysical Activity and Incident Hypertension Among Blacks: No Relationship?
Suggested citation for this article: Duncan DT, Quarells RC, Din-Dzietham R, Arroyo C, Davis SK. Physical activity and incident hypertension among blacks: no relationship? [letter to the editor]. Prev Chronic Dis [serial online] 2006 
Jul [date cited]. Available from: URL:
http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2006/jul/05_0197.htm.
 PEER REVIEWED To the Editor:Understanding the role (particularly the mechanisms of action) that physical 
activity plays in the development of hypertension among blacks is important for risk reduction efforts and public policy actions, 
especially because blacks bear the highest burden of hypertension, and cross-sectional studies 
suggest that physical activity may be  associated with reduced hypertension in blacks (1).  We therefore sought to ascertain 
this relationship  between physical activity and incident hypertension among 
blacks with a study design permitting causal inference. We performed a qualitative, systematic review of cohort studies 
examining the relationship between physical activity and incident hypertension 
among blacks. We searched for articles in Medline from January 1966 to February 2005, examined all potentially relevant articles, and reviewed the reference lists of those articles. 
Fourteen studies  assessed
physical activity and incident hypertension in all populations. Most studies were conducted 
among whites and were conducted in the United States; four studies were conducted 
in countries other than the United States and did not include blacks, and four 
other studies included blacks but one did not report the estimate of the 
physical activity–hypertension association by race. Only three studies met our inclusion criteria. Overall,  cohort studies confirmed the positive 
effects of physical activity on hypertension among whites. 
Five studies found that among whites, physical activity reduced hypertension in univariate analyses but not after adjusting for other covariates, 
such as age, body mass index, and alcohol intake. Univariate analyses of one 
study found a relationship between physical activity and hypertension among 
blacks (2); no such relationship was detected among blacks in multivariate 
analyses of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey I Epidemiologic 
Follow-up Study (2), Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults study (3), 
and Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study (4). However, the three studies have limitations that threaten 
internal and external validity. One limitation is possible nondifferential misclassification of physical activity levels 
due to poor physical activity ascertainment (2,4). 
To illustrate, one study (4) used a questionnaire that was inappropriate for 
blacks and women (5). Another  limitation is the lack of power to examine the 
physical activity–hypertension association among blacks because of a smaller 
 
sample of blacks, which was highlighted when investigators presented stratified analyses 
of race, sex, and physical activity levels (2). Other
limitations that violate internal validity include the following: 1) the unavailability of data on physical activity between baseline and follow-up (2,3) 
(i.e., physical activity change possibly indicating greater risk than baseline physical 
activity, particularly in long follow-ups); 2) self-reported bias (i.e., the 
possible inaccuracy of self-reported physical activity [2,4] and undiagnosed hypertension 
[2,3]); and 3) interviewer bias (i.e.,
the possible inaccuracy of physical activity data collected by interviewers) (3). Furthermore, blood pressure was not 
measured 
(hypertension was self-reported) at follow-up in one study (2). Self-report and interviewer 
bias can result in nondifferential misclassification. The limitations hindering external validity are as follows: 1) one study included only blacks
and whites aged 45 to 64 years at baseline (4), a sample representative of a limited subgroup of the black population (and hypertension affects blacks at 
younger ages 
than whites), 
and 2) most blacks in one study were from the South (4), which limits the generalizability 
of its findings. Given these limitations and the limited number of studies on 
blacks, we question whether  there is no relationship between physical activity and incident hypertension in blacks based on cohort studies. We would conclude from the published evidence that physically active blacks are not at a reduced risk for hypertension, but we recognize the numerous limitations of the research. Cohort studies did, however, report a biologically plausible inverse association of physical activity with hypertension risk. Widening the criteria of our review to include evidence
from cross-sectional studies and controlled clinical trials (6) suggests that there is probably a relationship. For 
example, controlled clinical trials demonstrate that physical activity is 
associated with blood pressure reduction among blacks (6). Moreover, a cohort 
study that assessed blood pressure continuously among blacks (7) suggests that loss of information and power due to 
categorization may be a major contributor to the lack of association
observed in cohort studies with categorical outcomes. All of these limitations 
may explain the lack of association between physical activity and incident 
hypertension among blacks. Additional cohort studies and controlled clinical trials are needed to 
examine physical activity and incident hypertension 
among blacks. 
Longitudinal mechanistic research designs that include the mediating variable of physical activity to hypertension are essential for 
researchers to develop effective hypertension risk reduction interventions and 
for policymakers to implement informed and effective policies. This may put us 
closer to reaching the aims of Healthy People 2010 — reducing the proportion of adults with hypertension 
and eliminating health disparities overall.   Dustin T. DuncanDepartment of Psychology, Public Health Sciences Institute, Morehouse 
College, and
Social Epidemiology Research Center
 Morehouse School of Medicine
 Atlanta, Ga
 Mr Duncan is now with the Department of Society, Human Development and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, and the Center for Community-Based ResearchDana-Farber Cancer Institute
 Boston, Mass
 Rakale Collins Quarells, PhD, Rebecca Din-Dzietham, MD, PhD, MPH, Cassandra Arroyo, PhD, Sharon K. Davis, 
PhD, MEd, MPASocial Epidemiology Research Center
 Morehouse School of Medicine
 Atlanta, Ga
 Back to top References
Collins R, Winkleby MA.
	African American women and men at high and low 
  risk for hypertension: a signal detection analysis of NHANES III, 1988-1994. Prev Med 2002;35(4):303-12.Ford ES, Cooper RS.
  Risk factors for hypertension in a national cohort study. Hypertension 1991;18(5):598-606.Dyer AR, Liu K, Walsh M, Kiefe C, Jacobs DR Jr, Bild DE.
  Ten-year incidence of elevated blood pressure and its predictors: the CARDIA study. Coronary 
  artery risk development in (young) adults. J Hum Hypertens 1999;13(1):13-21.Pereira MA, Folsom AR, McGovern PG, Carpenter M, Arnett DK, Liao D, et al.
  Physical activity and incident hypertension in black and white adults: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Prev Med 1999;28(3):304-12.Pols MA, Peeters PH, Bueno-De-Mesquita HB, Ocke MC, Wentink CA, Kemper HC, 
	et al.
	Validity and repeatability of a modified Baecke questionnaire on physical 
	activity. Int J Epidemiol 1995;24(2):381-8.Whelton SP, Chin A, Xin X, He J.
  Effects of aerobic exercise on blood pressure: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Ann Intern Med 2002;136(7):493-503.Liu K, Ruth KJ, Flack JM, Jones-Webb R, Burke G, Savage PJ, et al.
  
  Blood pressure in young blacks and whites: relevance of obesity and lifestyle 
  factors in determining differences. The CARDIA Study. Coronary Artery Risk 
  Development in Young Adults. Circulation 1996;93(1):60-6. Back to top | 
 |