|  
  
 |  
 |  
  Volume 
          2: 
          No. 1, January 2005 
ESSAYChallenges 
    and Opportunities in Border Health
Joel Rodríguez-Saldaña, MD
Suggested citation for this article: Rodríguez-Saldaña J. Challenges and opportunities 
in border health. Prev Chronic Dis [serial online] 2005 
Jan [date cited]. Available from: URL:
http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2005/jan/04_0099.htm.
 Approximately 11.5 million people reside in the 42 counties and 39 
    Mexican municipalities located along the U.S.-Mexico border, and 
    86% of those people reside in 14 pairs of sister cities, metropolitan areas 
    divided by the international border (1). Border residents share similar 
    resources and environmental problems: issues of great concern include air 
    quality, water quantity and quality, and animal control. The communities 
    along the border are economically and socially interdependent, with more 
    than 1 million legal northbound crossings every day. The need to establish 
    cooperation between the United States and Mexico for improving health has 
    led to collaborative initiatives between the public and private sectors
    (1). The principal health problems at the U.S.-Mexico border 
    are characterized by disparities in health systems (2), which 
    result from the lower health standards and socioeconomic conditions of 
    Mexican border communities compared with U.S. border communities. 
     
     Health-system disparities produce differences in and barriers to health 
    care access and use (3,4). Documented cases that 
    demand the creation of programs across the U.S.-Mexico border show different 
    rates in the prevalence of infectious disease, including hepatitis A, 
    salmonella, tuberculosis, dengue fever, and Helicobacter pylori 
    infection 
    (5,6). The magnitude and relevance of infectious disease as a major concern 
    along the U.S.-Mexico border have prompted the establishment of binational agreements, such as the U.S.-Mexico Border Infectious Disease 
    Surveillance Project, with the purpose of enhancing the effectiveness of 
    infectious disease prevention (7). On the other hand, populations on both 
    sides of the border share the impact of diseases — such as obesity and 
    diabetes — resulting from similar lifestyle changes. The prevalence rate for 
    diabetes along the U.S.-Mexico border is nearly 50% higher than the rate for 
    the rest of the United States, and Hispanics are more vulnerable to suffering 
    the burden of chronic complications because of genetic, economic, social, 
    behavioral, and psychological factors. This issue of Preventing Chronic Disease includes an introduction 
    and overview (8) as well as  additional articles  on the Border 
    Health Strategic Initiative (Border Health ¡SI!), a comprehensive 
    community approach to diabetes prevention and control primarily 
    concentrated in Yuma and Santa Cruz counties in Arizona. Border Health ¡SI! is based on models of community 
    capacity building and community change and was established through a partnership 
    between several border community groups and the University of Arizona. In 
    addition to being comprehensive and community oriented, Border Health ¡SI! 
    was designed to be acceptable to 
    stakeholders, effective in fostering and sustaining change, adaptable to 
    other communities, sustainable after funding, and process and 
    outcome focused.   To reduce the incidence of diabetes among individuals with 
    impaired glucose tolerance, Border Health ¡SI! has emphasized the 
    management of risk factors such as obesity through lifestyle changes 
    (e.g., nutritional counseling, increased physical activity, modest weight 
    loss). The program has also focused on community-based diabetes care 
    provided by a multidisciplinary team that targets patients with diabetes, 
    their families, and their health care providers. Community-health outreach 
    workers called promotores de salud have been instrumental in 
    implementing interventions designed to change personal health risk factors. The introductory article also describes the formation of community-based 
    coalitions called Special Action Groups (SAGs), whose primary goal is to 
    identify and implement plans for policy and environmental change. Meister 
    et al (9) provide details on how the SAGs in two communities were formed and 
    how they promoted activities to support physical activity and nutrition, and Steinfelt (10) reports on her experience as the community coordinator 
    responsible for orchestrating SAG activities. Other articles in this issue, 
    described below, provide examples of target populations.  Ingram et al report on the effectiveness of a series of diabetes 
    education classes to assist participants in gaining knowledge and skills 
    necessary to be physically active, control diet, monitor blood sugar, take 
    medications, and be aware of complications (11). Promotores de salud 
    play a key role in conducting outreach, participating in patient education, 
    and providing educational support in an overall framework in which 
    individual ability to manage diabetes is not separated from community 
    context and support for diabetes care. Community health centers administered 
    the program and provided a coordinator. Academic partners provided technical 
    assistance and conducted evaluations. The culturally competent curriculum 
    employed a variety of teaching methods to educate participants on how 
    diabetes affects the body. In addition, program staff measured blood 
    glucose, weight, and blood pressure at each of five weekly classes. 
    Improvements in self-management behaviors, HbA1c, random blood 
    glucose, and blood pressure were documented after five weeks. The authors 
    conclude that successful implementation of a program like Border Health ¡SI! 
    includes five essential elements: basic diabetes education, peer outreach 
    and support, integration of diabetes and clinical care, access to medical 
    care and medication, and sustainability. Teufel-Shone et al (12) describe how the University of Arizona and two 
    community health agencies collaborated to design, pilot, and assess the 
    feasibility of a lay health-outreach, worker-delivered diabetes education 
    program for families. The culturally appropriate program addressed family 
    food choices, physical activity, behavior change, communication, and support 
    behaviors. Seventy-two families participated, and pre- and post-evaluations 
    showed an increase in knowledge of diabetes risk factors and an increase in 
    family efficacy to change food and activity behaviors. Staten et al report their findings after implementing the School Health 
    Index (SHI) in 13 schools in two counties along the U.S.-Mexico border as 
    part of Border Health ¡SI! between 2000 and 
    2003 (13). The alarming increase in childhood obesity is a contributing 
    factor to the escalating rate of type 2 diabetes among adolescents. Although 
    the school environment is shown to neglect promotion of 
    physical activity (e.g., by eliminating or not offering physical education 
    classes) and good nutrition (e.g., by selling candy in vending machines), it offers opportunities to combat 
    obesity and diabetes. The SHI is a team-based program launched by the 
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2000 as a self-assessment and 
    planning tool for health promotion. The SHI enables schools to identify 
    strengths and weaknesses of physical activity and nutrition policies and 
    programs and to develop action plans for improving student health. Border 
    Health ¡SI! supported the hiring and training of an external (i.e., not 
    part of the school system) SHI coordinator in each county who 
    worked with the schools to implement the SHI, develop action plans, and 
    monitor progress. Process and participation varied from school to school, 
    but most schools 
     
    made at least one immediate 
    change in the school environment to promote student health. Analysis of short-term and intermediate outcomes 
    of the SHI at 
    these schools will be of great additional value. Staten et al also report on Pasos Adelante, a curriculum designed 
    in cultural context aimed at preventing diabetes, cardiovascular disease, 
    and other chronic diseases in Hispanic populations (14). The 12-week program 
    was facilitated by promotoras de salud in two 
    counties along the Arizona-Sonora, Mexico border. Sessions included physical 
    activity. Walking clubs were established that could continue after the 
    program concluded. Approximately 250 people participated in Pasos 
    Adelante. Analysis of 
    pre- and post-program questionnaires demonstrated a significant increase in 
    moderate to vigorous walking among participants as well as positive changes 
    in nutritional patterns. The success of the Pasos Adelante curriculum shows that a culturally 
    appropriate educational program can motivate people in border communities to 
    adopt healthier lifestyle behaviors. In a related article on original research, Abarca et al (15) illustrate how community indicators 
    were used to assess 
nutrition in communities targeted by Border 
    Health ¡SI!. 
    Local grocery store purchases were selected as an indicator, and a 
    structured 26-question interview was developed and administered to grocery store managers. In addition, the investigators gathered data from milk 
    distributors serving these communities. Results showed that food items with a higher
fat and higher caloric content were favored. The authors suggest that barriers to  acceptance of
healthier food items include lack of knowledge concerning healthy
foods and their prices. They conclude that more interventions are needed to 
    change dietary patterns, improve overall health, and prevent and control 
    diabetes in these communities. Schachter et al report their findings on implementing national 
    diabetes guidelines in five border-community health centers (two in Arizona 
    and three in Texas) (16). Each center selected their top four or five 
    indicators of diabetes care and performed baseline audits of medical records 
    in a minimal sample of 12 to 15 charts. Percentage level of compliance for 
    each indicator was compared with the average percentage level of overall 
    diabetes care compliance for each community health center. Priorities varied 
    from clinic to clinic, but the majority of indicators showed improvement. 
    All participating centers expressed interest in improving performance. Only 
    three centers, however, were audited again 24 months later: two maintained or 
    increased improvements, and one lost ground. As reported in other studies
(17), translating guidelines into practice is easier said than done: 
    “Between the health care we have and the care we could have lies not just a 
    gap, but a chasm” (18). Although there is increasing evidence of improvements in diabetes care, 
    not all people with diabetes are experiencing these benefits 
    (19). Addressing the complexities of diabetes management, improving the 
    established systems of care, and recognizing the decisive role of personal, 
    social, and economic factors on diabetes care for each individual with 
    diabetes are the greatest health challenges of our time. The 
    U.S.-Mexico border is a unique example of the interaction of global 
    interdependence: the challenges of providing formal diabetes education in 
    border communities are overwhelming (11). It would be desirable for this 
    interdependence to produce better standards of living and health for all, 
    but evidence confirms that this is not the case (1). The Border 
    Health Strategic Initiative is an illustrative example of a long and 
    successful record of collaborative work, with defined goals, including 
    process and outcome analysis. Resolution of the many challenges that the 
    emerging epidemic rates of diabetes presents at the U.S.-Mexico border will 
    certainly apply to other scenarios of health disparity.  Back to top Author InformationCorresponding author: Joel Rodríguez-Saldaña, MD, Research Center, Servicios 
    de Salud de Hidalgo, Avenida México 300, Pachuca Hidalgo 42039 México. 
    Telephone: 011(52)771-71-80770. E-mail: joelrds@internet.com.mx. Back to top References
Homedes N, Ugalde A.
      Globalization and health at the United 
      States-Mexico border. Am J Public Health 2003;93(12):2016-22.Zunker CL, Cummins JJ.
      Elderly health disparities on the U.S.-Mexico 
      border. J Cross Cult Gerontol 2004;19(1):13-25.Hunter JB, de Zapien JG, Denman CA, Moncada E, Papenfuss M, Wallace D, 
      et al.
      Healthcare access and utilization among women 40 and older at 
      the U.S.-Mexico border: predictors of a routine check-up. J Community 
      Health 2003;28(5):317-33.Landeck M, Garza C.
      Utilization of physician health care services in 
      Mexico by U.S. Hispanic border residents. Health Mark Q 2002;20(1):3-16.O’Rourke K, Goodman KJ, Grazioplene M, Redlinger T, Day RS.
      Determinants of geographic variation in Helicobacter pylori infection 
      among children on the US-Mexico border. Am J Epidemiol 
      2003 Oct 15;158(8):816-24.Goodman KJ, O’Rourke K, Wang C, Redlinger T, Campos A, de la Rosa JM.
      Helicobacter pylori infection in pregnant women from a U.S.-Mexico border 
      population. J Immigr Health 2003;5(3):99-107.Weinberg M, Waterman S, Lucas CA, Falcon VC, Morales PK, Lopez LA, et 
      al.
      The U.S.-Mexico Border Infectious Disease Surveillance project: 
      establishing bi-national border surveillance. Emerg Infect Dis 
      2003;9(1):97-102.Cohen SJ, Ingram M. Border Health Strategic Initiative: overview and 
      introduction to a community-based model for diabetes prevention and 
      control. Prev Chronic Dis [serial online] 2005 Jan.Meister JS, Guernsey de Zapien J. 
      Bringing health policy issues front and
center in the community: expanding the role of community health
coalitions. Prev Chronic Dis [serial online] 2005 Jan.Steinfelt VE. The Border Health Strategic Initiative from a 
      community perspective. Prev Chronic Dis [serial online] 2005 
      Jan.Ingram M, Gallegos G, Elenes J. Diabetes is a 
      community issue: the critical elements of a successful outreach and 
      education model in the U.S.-Mexico border. Prev Chronic Dis [serial 
      online] 2005 Jan.Teufel-Shone NI,
Drummond R, Rawiel U. Developing and 
      adapting a family-based diabetes program at the U.S.-Mexico border. 
      Prev Chronic Dis [serial online] 2005 Jan. Staten L, Teufel-Shone NI, Steinfelt VE, Ortega N, Halverson K, Flores C, 
      et al. The school health index as an impetus for change. 
      Prev Chronic Dis [serial online] 2005 Jan. Staten LK, Scheu
LL, Bronson D, Peña V, Elenes JJ. 
Pasos Adelante: 
      the effectiveness of a community-based chronic disease prevention program. 
      Prev Chronic Dis [serial online] 2005 Jan. Abarca J, Ramachandran S. Using 
      community indicators to assess nutrition in Arizona-Mexico border 
      communities. Prev Chronic Dis [serial online] 2005 Jan. Schachter KA, Cohen SJ. From theory to practice: challenges to 
      implementing national diabetes guidelines with five community health 
      centers on the border. Prev Chronic Dis [serial online] 2005 
      Jan.Larme AC, Pugh JA.
      Evidence-based guidelines meet the real world: 
      the 
      case of diabetes care. Diabetes Care 2001;24(10):1728-33.Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system 
      for the 21st century. Washington (DC): National Academies 
      Press; 2001.Vinicor F. The future of diabetes: what is there besides new 
      medicines? Clinical Diabetes 2004;22:94-6.  Back to top | 
 |