  
  
 | 
 
  | 
  
 Volume 1: 
          No. 3, July 2004 
BOOK REVIEW 
How Healthy Are We? A
    National Study of Well-Being at Midlife
Editors: Orville G. Brim, Carol D. Ryff, Ronald C. Kessler 
    Chicago 
    The University of Chicago Press 
    Publication Date: 2004 
    688 pages, 74 figures, 104 tables 
    Price: $42.00 
    ISBN (cloth): 0-226-07475-7
Suggested citation for this article: Sutphen SK.
    How healthy are we? A national study of well-being at midlife [book review].
    Prev Chronic Dis [serial online] 2004 Jul [date cited].
    Available from: URL: http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2004/ 
    jul/04_0040.htm.
     
Every human being is the author of his own health or disease. 
— Siddhartha Gautama, The Buddha, 563–483 BC 
 
Many Americans might agree with this statement, but if asked to rate
    their own physical, mental, and health beliefs, what would their responses
    be? How would they respond at midlife? How Healthy Are We? A National
    Study of Well-Being at Midlife answers these questions. 
In 1990, The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation established
    the Research Network on Successful Midlife Development (MIDMAC), directed by
    one of the book’s editors, Orville Brim. The multidisciplinary network was
    tasked with examining adults aged 40 to 60 as part of the foundation’s
    series of studies on midlife development. MIDMAC identified the following
    goals: 
- Establish specific indicators for a successful midlife.
 
- Establish a factual basis for the course of midlife.
 
- Identify factors that may influence the course of midlife 
      development.
 
- Identify strategies that individuals may use to deal with midlife
        challenges.
 
 
MIDMAC developed a national survey known as MIDUS (Midlife Development in the United
    States) (available at http://midmac.med.harvard.edu/research.html*)
    to help meet these goals. In How Healthy Are We?, Brim and colleagues
    present a collection of articles that summarize MIDUS survey findings. 
The authors organize the text into four sections. Chapter 1 provides
    background on MIDMAC and the development of the MIDUS survey, including
    information on samples, design, measures, and content. Chapters 2 through 6
    discuss assessments of physical health and the impact of age, gender, and
    socioeconomic status. Chapters 7 through 14 explore assessments of
    psychological well-being and quality of life. Chapters 15 through 21 focus
    on contexts that affect midlife experiences, including work, family, and
    geography. Each chapter provides background research, information on how MIDUS was designed and implemented, results, and a comparison between MIDUS
    and prior studies. 
The audience for this text includes a broad range of scientists, such as
    sociologists, epidemiologists, mental health practitioners, psychologists,
    and anthropologists, reflecting the range of disciplines involved in
    developing the survey. In addition, the audience includes physicians, public
    health practitioners, and policy makers. 
Of particular interest from a policy perspective is Chapter 17, which
    centers on work, family, and social class. The authors find that the lower
    the income level, the more likely it is that work is juxtaposed with poor social
    support, a chronically ill child, or other caretaking responsibility.
    Low-income jobs do not provide flexibility in sick leave or work hours,
    resulting in a disproportionate number of children who suffer from unmet
    health and developmental needs — and ultimately impacting our nation’s
    health. 
Chapter 6, a discussion of menopause and the aging process, is another
    well-written and accessible chapter. The author finds that, for most women,
    menopause is a benign event unassociated with the severe physical and
    psychological distress traditionally portrayed. 
Other interesting findings in the book include the following: 
- Women report worse health than men, but they devote more effort to health
        maintenance and have greater longevity.
 
- The social/income gradient to ill health is greater in men than
        women and is independent of education.
 
- Adults rate the development of relationships with others as the most important factor in
        having a good life, followed by health, then family.
 
- While daily stresses or demands are greater in the lives of young and
        midlife adults compared to individuals in other life stages, midlife
        adults feel they have a greater level of mastery and control over
        stresses and demands than young adults do.
 
 
Overall, How Healthy Are We? answers the title question through
    research establishing midlife as a time when most adults have a positive
    view of physical health, have established supportive family relationships,
    are pleased with their financial situation, have a good quality of life, and
    have control and mastery of their work. Education, socioeconomic standing,
    race, and gender affect all of the above. 
How Healthy Are We? also can serve as a basis for brainstorming
    community-based approaches for tackling chronic health issues and for
    devising new methods to encourage behavioral change. For example, an
    awareness of gender differences in health-maintenance behavior, noted in
    Chapter 1, could change approaches to promoting weight loss or smoking
    cessation for men and women. 
Because the MIDUS survey included individuals aged 25–74, a more
    complete picture emerges on midlife in relation to the other life stages. How
    Healthy Are We? differs from other texts on midlife by presenting this
    expanded perspective. Some texts define midlife from a traditional
    psychological or biological perspective using staging or physical changes.
    Others take a health-management approach, focusing on specific aspects of
    midlife such as parenting or sexuality, or examining midlife in the context of
    larger societal trends such as divorce, two-income families, and longer life
    expectancy. 
MIDMAC and MIDUS serve as  excellent blueprints for an integrative approach to investigation. The book describes  carefully
    developed pilot studies and creatively used satellite studies that
    provide information on a national level as well as on specific target
    groups. The public health profession could apply this approach to a wide
    range of problems. 
The authors provide great insight into the physical, psychological, and
    social development that takes place during this important stage of life and
    establish a clear baseline for further exploration of midlife issues. 
Sussan K. Sutphen, MD 
    Choice Care Occupational Medicine 
    Atlanta, Ga 
*URLs for nonfederal organizations are provided solely as a 
service to our users. URLs do not constitute an endorsement of any organization 
by CDC or the federal government, and none should be inferred. CDC is 
not responsible for the content of Web pages found at these URLs. 
Back to top  | 
 
  |