Actions & Recommendations
In October, 2015, TATFAR revised its work plan and identified 20 actions for continued collaboration through 2020.
Actions for 2016 through 2020 are currently being implemented.
Acronyms
AMR – antimicrobial resistance
ASPR – Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response
BARDA – Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority
CDC – Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
CFIA –Canadian Food Inspection Agency
CIHR – Canadian Institutes of Health Research
CLSI – Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute
COMBACTE – Combatting Bacterial Resistance in Europe
DG RTD – Directorate-General for Research and Innovation
DG SANTE – Directorate-General for Health and Consumers
DHHS – Department of Health and Human Services
DoD – Department of Defense
EC – European Commission
ECDC – European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control
EFSA – European Food Safety Authority
EMA – European Medicines Agency
FDA – Food and Drug Administration
FHI – Norwegian Institute of Public Health (also called NIPH)
GLASS – Global Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System
HC – Health Canada
MDR – multi-drug resistant
NIAID – National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
NIH – National Institutes of Health
NMA –Norwegian Medicines Agency
NVI – Norwegian Veterinary Institute
OGA – Office of Global Affairs
PHAC – Public Health Agency of Canada
USDA – United States Department of Agriculture
Key Area I. Appropriate therapeutic use in human and veterinary medicine
| Action Number | Description | Implementer Organizations | 
|---|---|---|
| 1.1 | Develop guidance for assessing appropriate antibiotic use 
 | CDC, DoD, ECDC, FHI, PHAC | 
| 1.2 | Publish a review of antibiotic reduction goals in human medicine from TATFAR partner countries 
 | CDC, ECDC, FHI, PHAC | 
| 1.3 | Continue the coordination of campaigns to promote appropriate antibiotic use in human medicine 
 | CDC, ECDC, FHI, PHAC | 
| 1.4 | Cooperate in the development of methodology for measuring and reporting the consumption of antimicrobials per species in veterinary medicine 
 | CFIA, DG SANTE, EFSA, EMA, FDA, NVI, USDA | 
| 1.5 | Collaborate on implementation of the Guidelines for Risk Analysis of Foodborne Antimicrobial Resistance prepared by Codex Alimentarius 
 | CFIA, DG SANTE, EFSA, EMA, FDA, ECDC, NVI, PHAC | 
| 1.6 | Enhance information sharing on approaches to promoting appropriate use in veterinary communities 
 | CDC, CFIA, DG SANTE, EFSA, EMA, FDA, NVI, PHAC, USDA | 
| 1.7 | Cooperate in the areas of research and surveillance aiming to improve understanding of foodborne transmission of bacteria resistant to certain classes of antimicrobials 
 | CDC, CFIA, DG RTD, DG SANTE, EFSA, EMA, FDA, ECDC, NVI, PHAC USDA | 
| 1.8 | Cooperatein improving understanding of the impact on public and animal health of restricting certain uses of antimicrobial drugs in food-producing animals 
 | CDC, CFIA, DG RTD, DG SANTE, ECDC, EFSA, FDA, USDA | 
Key Area II. Prevention of drug-resistant infections
| Action Number | Description | Implementer Organizations | 
|---|---|---|
| 2.1 | Consultation and collaboration on a point-prevalence survey (PPS) for healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) 
 | CDC, ECDC, FHI, PHAC | 
| 2.2 | Develop a common system for sharing and analyzing bacterial resistance patterns for pathogens identified as urgent and serious threats 
 | CDC, DoD, ECDC, FHI, PHAC | 
| 2.3 | Develop a rapid alert system for communication of new or novel antimicrobial resistance findings 
 | CDC, DoD, ECDC, FHI, PHAC | 
| 2.4 | Encourage efforts to harmonise interpretive criteria for susceptibility reporting of bacterial isolates for contribution of data to the WHO Global Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (GLASS) 
 | CDC, ECDC, FDA, FHI, PHAC, other partners | 
| 2.5 | Coordinate guidance for detection of outbreaks or concerning resistance trends and appropriate response 
 | CDC, ECDC, FHI, PHA | 
Key Area III. Strategies for improving the pipeline of new antimicrobial drugs
| Action Number | Description | Implementer Organizations | 
|---|---|---|
| 3.1 | Communicate on the development of a package of economic incentives that could effectively incentivize antibacterial therapy development 
 | BARDA, CIHR, DG RTD, DG SANTE, FHI, Industry Canada | 
| 3.2 | Conduct a feasibility assessment of options for pull incentives and development of a potential joint incentive mechanism 
 | BARDA, CIHR, DG RTD, DG SANTE, FHI, Industry Canada | 
| 3.3 | Foster international research and product development to address challenging problems in the management of AR 
 | BARDA, CIHR, DG RTD, FHI, NIH | 
| 3.4 | Regulatory agencies discuss common issues in refining and furthering the science of antibacterial drug development and regulation, including clinical trial design to facilitate the development of antibacterial drugs and maintain a single development program that can be utilized by both regulatory authorities 
 | EMA, FDA, HC, NMA | 
| 3.5 | Continue regular meetings between FDA and EMA to discuss common issues in the area of antibacterial drug development and regulation 
 | EMA, FDA, HC, NMA | 
| 3.6 | Exchange information on possible regulatory approaches to the development of alternatives for managing bacterial infections, such as bacteriophage therapy and vaccines for healthcare-associated infections 
 | EMA, FDA, HC, NMA | 
| 3.7 | Veterinary regulatory agencies will discuss the particular challenges related to authorisation of novel veterinary therapies presented as alternatives to antimicrobials 
 | CFIA, DG SANTE, EMA, FDA, HC, Norway, USDA | 
- Page last reviewed: August 18, 2017
- Page last updated: August 18, 2017
- Content source:
 ShareCompartir
ShareCompartir