Physics
Textbooks
Boundless Physics
Atomic Physics
The Early Atom
Physics Textbooks Boundless Physics Atomic Physics The Early Atom
Physics Textbooks Boundless Physics Atomic Physics
Physics Textbooks Boundless Physics
Physics Textbooks
Physics
Concept Version 8
Created by Boundless

The Rutherford Model

Rutherford confirmed that the atom had a concentrated center of positive charge and relatively large mass.

Learning Objective

  • Describe gold foil experiment performed by Geiger and Marsden under directions of Rutherford and its implications for the model of the atom


Key Points

    • Rutherford overturned Thomson's model in 1911 with his well-known gold foil experiment, in which he demonstrated that the atom has a tiny, high-mass nucleus.
    • In his experiment, Rutherford observed that many alpha particles were deflected at small angles while others were reflected back to the alpha source.
    • This highly concentrated, positively charged region is named the "nucleus" of the atom.

Term

  • alpha particle

    A positively charged nucleus of a helium-4 atom (consisting of two protons and two neutrons), emitted as a consequence of radioactivity; α-particle.


Full Text

The Rutherford model is a model of the atom named after Ernest Rutherford. Rutherford directed the famous Geiger-Marsden experiment in 1909, which suggested, according to Rutherford's 1911 analysis, that J. J. Thomson's so-called "plum pudding model" of the atom was incorrect. Rutherford's new model for the atom, based on the experimental results, contained the new features of a relatively high central charge concentrated into a very small volume in comparison to the rest of the atom. This central volume also contained the bulk of the atom's mass . This region would later be named the "nucleus. "

Atomic Planetary Model

Basic diagram of the atomic planetary model; electrons are in green, and the nucleus is in red

In 1911, Rutherford designed an experiment to further explore atomic structure using the alpha particles emitted by a radioactive element . Following his direction, Geiger and Marsden shot alpha particles with large kinetic energies toward a thin foil of gold. Measuring the pattern of scattered particles was expected to provide information about the distribution of charge within the atom. Under the prevailing plum pudding model, the alpha particles should all have been deflected by, at most, a few degrees. However, the actual results surprised Rutherford. Although many of the alpha particles did pass through as expected, many others were deflected at small angles while others were reflected back to the alpha source.

Thomson's Model vs. Rutherford's Model

Top: Expected results -- alpha particles pass through the plum pudding model of the atom undisturbed. Bottom: Observed results -- a small portion of the particles were deflected, indicating a small, concentrated positive charge. (Note that the image is not to scale; in reality the nucleus is vastly smaller than the electron shell. )

From purely energetic considerations of how far particles of known speed would be able to penetrate toward a central charge of 100 e, Rutherford was able to calculate that the radius of his gold central charge would need to be less than $3.4 \cdot 10^{-14}$ meters. This was in a gold atom known to be about $10^{-10}$ meters in radius; a very surprising finding, as it implied a strong central charge less than $\frac{1}{3000}$th of the diameter of the atom.

Intro to the History of Atomic Theory - The Rutherford Model

Rutherford, Thomson, electrons, nuclei, and plums. I don't mean to be a bohr, but do you think pudding should have a role in serious scientific inquiry?

[ edit ]
Edit this content
Prev Concept
The Thomson Model
The Bohr Model of the Atom
Next Concept
Subjects
  • Accounting
  • Algebra
  • Art History
  • Biology
  • Business
  • Calculus
  • Chemistry
  • Communications
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • Microbiology
  • Physics
  • Physiology
  • Political Science
  • Psychology
  • Sociology
  • Statistics
  • U.S. History
  • World History
  • Writing

Except where noted, content and user contributions on this site are licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 with attribution required.